Right, apparently people STILL don’t fucking get it when it comes to porn.
If I choose to make porn (which I am choosing to do, incidentally), or if I choose to be an escort (which I did, once upon a time), I am not ‘selling myself’. I am not for sale. My body, my mind, my personality… these things are not for sale. What is for sale, is the option to look at my body, or interact with it. If I fuck somebody, or somebody takes a naked picture of me, I’m not losing any part of myself. No part of me has been taken in exchange for cash, just an image. If you take a photo in an art gallery, nobody’s going to accuse you of stealing the art work. If you touch a statue, and walk away from it, you’re not taking part of it with you. It’s the same for my body. If you see it, or touch it, no part of me is lost, no part of what makes me who I am is changed.
And then we come to the assumption that I’m ‘degrading’ myself in some manner by banging people for cash. Well, I’m not. I felt more degraded working minimum wage in McDonalds than I ever do when I’m taking naked photos to put online, or when I fuck random people for free (yeah, I’m a big ol’ slut, your point?) or when I’m signing up to do a screen test with a porn company. No branch of sex work or or sex as a hobby seems to be capable of making me feel degraded. And if I don’t feel degraded, then you don’t get to tell me I feel degraded, because you are not in possession of a greater understanding of my emotions than I am.
Your judgments on sex workers are contributing to the lack of safety evident in the mainstream porn industry, they are contributing to a continued ban on prostitution, making the lives of sex workers really fucking unsafe in many circumstances. By judging sex workers, you are contributing to a system that means if a sex worker is raped, nobody cares. If a prostitute is murdered, it takes about 5 more killed before the police bother to investigate. Whether you judge sex workers as bad people or as objects of pity, you’re harming us.
Do not tell me what I am allowed to use my body for and how I am supposed to feel when I go outside of that.
Live by advertising, die by advertising
A beer company, Molson, came up with a cunning plan. Their market is primarily male, so they bought ads in women’s magazines, not to broaden their market, but to set up a ploy to appeal to men.
Ad placed in Cosmo:
Ad placed in Playboy:
“HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF WOMEN.
PRE-PROGRAMMED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE.
As you read this, women across America are reading something very different: an advertisement (fig. 1) scientifically formulated to enhance their perception of men who drink Molson. The ad shown below, currently running in Cosmopolitan magazine, is a perfectly tuned combination of words and images designed by trained professionals. Women who are exposed to it experience a very positive feeling. A feeling which they will later project directly onto you. Triggering the process is as simple as ordering a Molson Canadian (fig. 2).
Extravagant dinners. Subtitled movies. Floral arrangements tied together with little pieces of hay. It gets old. And it gets expensive, depleting funds that could go to a new set of of 20-inch rims. But thanks to the miracle of Twin Advertising Technology, you can achieve success without putting in any time or effort. So drop the bouquet and pick up a Molson Canadian…
For those who argue that it’s just a funny ad: OF COURSE, this ad is manipulating men. It won’t, by intent, convince women to buy Molson beer. The ad campaign is targeted entirely at men, and it works because there are a lot of men who will laugh at an ad that makes out women to be stupid and easily swayed by sweaters and puppy dogs.
What you’re missing is that the response to the ad, these juxtapositions of the two commercials, shows that they are incredibly dismissive of women. Molson is playing up the idea that women are gullible and not very bright, and that men will get a kick out of a campaign that claims to manipulate women in the shallowest possible way.
And of course, if it works and sells beer, it shows that men are gullible and not very bright. Sexism hurts men and women, since here it is, used to trick people into drinking crappy beer.
- Live by advertising, die by advertising by PZ Meyers.
(subtitled movies are girly now?!)
Dr. Keith Ablow of Fox Newscorp: “Don’t Let Your Kids Watch Chaz Bono On ‘Dancing With the Stars’”
“Many of the children who might be watching will be establishing a sense of self which includes, of course, a sexual/gender identity. Some will be girls becoming comfortable with dramatic changes in their bodies. Some will be boys coming to terms with integrating the dawn of manhood with exquisite feelings of vulnerability. Young viewers will include tomboyish girls and sensitive, less stereotypically masculine boys. They will also include children who have sustained the losses of loved ones and are wrestling with depression, perhaps wondering who they are absent their deceased mothers or fathers.”
And yet…none of that has one fucking thing to do with Chaz Bono.
What happened to “Physician, do no harm?”
So…are you referring to the world in which Chaz Bono was born (the late 1960s and early 1970s), where children with ambiguous genitalia and congenital conditions were routinely subjected to painful, arbitrary sexual re-assignment surgery based upon opinionated aesthetics and the flip of a coin?
Or are you merely projecting the creepy, twisted world of Fox News, that bastion of insecure white males who continually overcompensate for their own lack of male sexual confidence by browbeating and terrorizing the rest of us?
You cannot possibly understand how few fucks I give about what Chaz Bono is packing in the front of his trousers OR what he does on his own time with his own body.
Chaz Bono is a nice, humble, harmless guy just trying to find his place in the world.
Fox News, not so much.
#gender #transgender #keith ablow
So Jim Carrey says his video message was a joke. And you know, I believe that he thinks that it was harmless & funny or whatever. I’m sure Emma Stone will laugh it off in public too, but I’m not at all sold tat she won’t be the least bit creeped out by it. In fact I’d lay heavy odds on her finding it disturbing & making a mental note not to be alone with him. Because let’s be honest if he wasn’t a wealthy white cis man people would be rushing to help her get better security and a restraining order. And they’d be right to do that since stalking type behavior isn’t funny or cute or harmless. The fact that we’ve normalized intrusions on a woman’s space to the point where he could think this was a good prank says a lot of things about our culture. None of it good, & things get even uglier when you factor in how class comes into play.